FANTASY FOOTBALL TRADE MARKET RJ HARVEY SELL HIGH

FANTASY FOOTBALL TRADE MARKET RJ HARVEY
SELL HIGH
By Muntradamus
BEAST DOME NATION.
I was a broken record about RJ Harvey this Summer. I kept him as a Draft Guide BUST as long as I could before I just had to go on a spree on telling everyone how low their Fantasy IQ was for believing in RJ Harvey.
RJ HARVEY ROOKIE PROFILE BEAST OR BUST
FANTASYPROS RJ HARVEY PRESEASON RANK
Yes that is correct, RJ Harvey was my #67 RB. Second lowest Rank on FantasyPros. 43 Spots behind where the Sheep Expert Ranked Harvey as RB #24.
I claimed RJ Harvey would be a BUST on IG & FantasyPros & X
Through one game of the NFL season. All the Sheep Fantasy Expert know that they have led their group to a losing season. Watch Dave Richard of CBS in this video explain.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOWOcQ0kZRh/?igsh=Y2Q0NmNiMjc3NQ%3D%3D
Here is the truth. The truth I have been trying to get you to realize all Preseason before it was too late. The Broncos did not bring in JK Dobbins to be a water boy. JK Dobbins is a starter quality RB in the NFL, he helped lead the Chargers to the playoffs last season. For everyone to think RJ Harvey was going to be the #1 RB for the Broncos obviously does not understand Football logistics. After the Broncos faithful saw JK Dobbins run in the game winning TD. Following that up with a couple big runs to kill the clock in the next possession, it is over for RJ.
Time to sell High on RJ Harvey. He had a long run in the 4th quarter that saved his day. Outside of that, he is nothing more than a roll of a dice fantasy option at best as he is one of many backup RBs for the Broncos. Last week Badie was trusted just as much as Harvey in that backup RB role. While Harvey may have outplayed Badie to the naked eye, it does not mean Harvey will get enough touches to even warrant being a Fantasy option. Take away the long run in the 4th quarter, and fantasy owners could begin the process of thinking about dropping their 4th-6th round RB.
TRADE RJ HARVEY NOW
Who to trade him for is the question. The answer to that question is one of the packages below.